The artist adjusts the settings on her glitchcore software and begins to create a sketch of a robot. The robot is a sleek design, with intricate lines and curves. However, something is not quite right – as the artist works, glitches begin to appear in the image, creating a jarring and unsettling effect.

The artist continues to work, adding more and more glitches to the robot’s design. She seems to be drawn to the chaotic effects that the glitches create, and finds a kind of beauty in their unpredictability. Eventually, the robot is finished – it is a disturbing but fascinating sight, a machine that is both graceful and grotesque at the same time.

The artist knows that this robot will never function properly – it is held together by glitches, and will always be unstable. But she doesn’t care – she sees it as a work of art, something that exists outside of normalcy and reality. The robot is her creation, and she loves it for its flaws as much as for its beauty.

Glitchcore and traditional aesthetics have different goals in mind. Aesthetics aims to create a sense of beauty or order, while glitchcore seeks to create chaos and disruption. Glitchcore is often intentionally jarring and unsettling, while traditional aesthetics aims to be pleasing to the eye.

Glitchcore also differs from traditional aesthetics in its use of glitches. Glitches are unintended errors or malfunctions in digital media, which glitchcore artists often exploit to create their art. This can result in images, sounds, and videos that are chaotic and unpredictable, quite different from the refined and controlled aesthetic of traditional art.